The experts are mounting a new interpretation of contemporary history that is, because of its optimism that the Muslim world has turned a corner, gaining uncritical acceptance. Their notion is that the eruption of street protest democracy and demands for freedom in North Africa and the Middle East, along with the toppling of several anti-democratic regimes, indicates that the average Muslim, or, at least, the average young male Muslim, who represents the politically volatile element in Islam, has turned away from anti-Americanism and anti-Westernism as motivating ideologies. And the killing of bin Laden, though obviously only symbollic in political terms, promises that Jihadism and Islamism have begun to wane as a power in Islamic social movement.
The problem with this happy interpretation of events is that it ignores the basic religious character of Islam, which remains unchanged. And that character is supersessionism. Islam is based on the belief that God's convenant with ancient Israel and God's covenant with gentiles through Christ, have been abrogated and superceded by God's covenant with Mohammed. From the Muslim religious point of view, there can be no Islamic tolerance toward Jews and Christians, no toleration that accepts the basic claims of Judaism and Christianity, until Jews and Christians renounce their blasphemy, which is their claim that their covenants with God remain valid. From the Judaic and Christian point of view, God has only made another, separate covenant with the Muslims through Mohammed, without cancelling his earlier deals with Jews as God's People and Christians as saving of gentiles through Christ. There was a supersessionist element in early and Medieval Christianity, but modern Christians reject it. Islam has not and shows no signs of rejecting its supersessionist ideology. As a consequence, Islam remains hostile to toward those societies--Europeanized West and the United States--which are Christian. That supersessionist hostility is like a store of gun powder, always ready for the lighted match.
Further, while the supersessionist passion might otherwise abate in the breast of Islam, as Islamic societies mature, it will not, because the most dynamic religious force in the World today is Christian, specifically Pentacostalism. Pentacostalism challenges Islam for religious allegience precisely in the marginal societies of the world, which are unsettled by the social shift to modernity, from rural to urban social arrangements, from agricultural to industrial work. Hence we see the flash points of religious violence meted out by Muslims in Africa and Southeast Asia, where Pentacostalism is most vibrant.
Only when Islam begins the modernizing task of critically interpreting its foundational religious text, as the West did in the nineteenth century in the intellectual movement known as historical criticism, and renounces supersessionism as a historical mistake will Islam end its anti-Westernism and its anti-Americanism. There is no evidence that Islam is ready for this task. To the contrary, the Arab Spring is providing the opportunity for a profoundly fundamentalist and stridently ignorant religious party, the Society of Muslim Brothers, aka the Muslim Brotherhood, to obtain political power to mobilize Muslim states for its avowed purpose. It's putative renunciation of violence to achieve its aim does not mean that it will not seize the power of the state to achieve it. Watch for the Arab Spring to lead eventually to the further spread of anti-semitism. Violence will follow. And watch for the Arab Spring to lead eventually to more anti-Christian violence, especially in Africa, geographically close to influence from the Middle Eastern home of Mohammedanism.
Recent Comments