I have lived in three of our nation's most environmentally damaged, simply filthiest, places--rural New England, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and the Los Angeles Basin. And I have lived to see each of them dramatically cleaned up, returned to startling beauty to become inspiring, often breath-taking, environments in which to live.
Earth Day symbolizes the environmental movement which, during President Nixon's presidency, put in place landmark legislation to clean up America. Air, water, and land had been polluted by the unrestrained industrialization of the previous century. Even remote, rural areas of the nation, like the small village in northern New England, where I grew up in the 1940s and 1950s, had been damaged by that industrialization. Paper mills dumped their untreated wastes from making paper into the streams and rivers, making the water deadly for fish, poisonous for people, stinky, and ugly to view. The river that flowed through my home village, Plymouth, New Hampshire, was so polluted that our high school mocked it in our school song. We sang, "Far above the polluted waters, where our banner flies ... here's to you, our alma mater, dear old stinky high". I can recall that I would hold my breath when crossing bridges over the river, fearful that the foul odor would aggrevate my severe asthma. Over the next several decades, the village of fewer than 2,000 persons, required with other villages and towns along it's river to do so, put in waste treatment plants to treat the sewage they had previously been dumping into its water. The paper mills and textile mills were required to treat their waste. By the end of the century, Atlantic salmon were returning to the river's headwaters to spawn.
My first teaching job was a one-year stint as a visiting assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh. After the war--that is, the second world war--, led by its business and industrial giants, such as the Mellon family, the steel mills of the city were slowly cleaned up. The city that had been so cloudy with air pollution at noon as to obscure the sun had, by the time I lived there, emerged through the murk. But it remained polluted. During the night, tiny particles and fibers of steel, nearly invisible filings, would settle out of the air onto the ground, the buildings, streets, and cars. In the morning, you could turn on your automobile's windshield wiper blades for one swipe. They would leave a long line of steel filings where they ended their sweep of the glass. Over the next few decades, the last steel mill inside the city closed. And steel mills up and down the rivers were, at least partially, cleaned up. The fount of the Ohio River was, if not exactly purified, certainly greatly cleaner and beautiful. I loved Pittsburgh, its industrial muscularity, its historic architecture, and its urban renewal. It was a great place to live, skyscrapers and hilly urban neighborhoods often stunning in their natural setting at the confluence of two rivers along side high hills.
Finally, Riverside, California, at the eastern edge of the "South Coast Air Basin"--to give the officialized designation its capitalization. When I arrived to teach at the University of California, the city had a reputation as a historic and architectural gem set among thousands of acres of navel orange groves. State governmental hearings, a few years later, that preceded smog laws unhappily smeared the city's reputation as effectively as the smog that cooked in Los Angeles and drifted east to it. Nonetheless, the clean air laws, the requirement of vehicle emission controls, cleaned up the air over the next several decades so effectively that, by the mid-1990s, the air was clear and the surrounding ring of mountains visible year-round. The dramatically beautiful setting, that had been depicted on fruit crate labels for two generations, returned.
Though I am politically conservative, I happily acknowledge the effectiveness of the environmental laws that have cleaned up much, though certainly not all, of the mess created by industrialization and, as in the case of untreated sewage, urbanization in the century from the 1850s to the 1950s. It was a chore that mostly had to be done by the federal government, because pollution crossed state borders.That accomplishment does not mean that debate today over the founding environmental laws is illegitimate or unreasonable. Conservative thinkers in the past generation have proposed market solutions to environmental problems that have changed the regulatory and enforcement paradigms on which the 1970s environmental laws were based. New market solutions will be implemented in piecemeal, of not replacement, mode. What the new thinking about implementation has not replaced is the environmental consensus to clean up and reclaim our environment forged in the 1960s.
Recent Comments