Two Piece Reclining Figure, No. 2. 1960. Henry Moore. Tate Gallery, London.
Illustration 1. Reference Photograph.
This is "Reclining Figure (2 Piece), 1960" at the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art. I have not verified that it is a cast of the same sculpture of this name that I studied at the Tate.
Linked Illustration. Notice Moore's similar two-dimensional treatment of an architectural theme, "Tunnel Arch and Window 1971".
1. Basic description. Two pieces of cast bronze, pieces separated by about 12 inches and physically free standing, i.e., not connected by a base (lintel or plinth). One piece is a head figure/torso with a 3 holed tunnel through the middle; the other piece is a bridge form. The head-piece is perhaps 4 1/2 feet high by 3 feet radius; the bridge-piece is ca. 4 feet long by 3 feet wide. The color is dark brown, nearly burnt umber, with occasional green patches and muddy-red patches.
Illustration 2
Click image to enlarge
2. Setting. The sculpture is set in the main foyer, just beyond the entrance foyer, of the Tate, beneath a dome of glass. The sculpture is at the center of the foyer; light falls from directly above; there is no artificial illumination in the daytime.
3. Structural composition. The head-piece is basically a solid form, although it has a small tunnel through the middle. It is basically cubical in form, with strong horizontal lines. There are some diagonal lines, but these are softened and weak. Hence:
Illustration 3
Click image to enlarge
The horizontal lines are carved out of the cubical block, suggesting a figure reclining on one elbow.
The second piece has the structure of a table with four legs, or two inverted U's connected by a tunnel (classical arches, classical barrel vault). The inverted U's are also basically cubic forms that have been carved out.
The two pieces have been oriented toward one another along a broken axis. Hence:
Illustration 4
Click image to enlarge
The head on the head-piece oriented inwardly. Hence:
Illustration 5
Click image to enlarge
The two pieces are integrated by sharing the same plane on their top surfaces, which is soft outward curving and sloped down. The two pieces are further integrated by the downward and inward slope of their top lines. Hence:
Illustration 6
Click image to enlarge
4. Surface technique. The surface texture is rough with tool marks (but without mold marks). Everywhere the gouges and striations of the adz and rasps are evidence. Some surfaces appear to have been built up with rapidly-hardening plaster and worked by broad wood tools. The effect has been to provide a light absorbing surface with broad deep shadows. This effect is reinforced by the light source - natural, soft light falls from above to produce deep, dark cavities. This effect was certainly intended by Moore, since even with an artificial horizontal light, the tunnels would produce these dark caves, from some angle of viewing. The surface technique is further reinforced by the chromatic qualities; the bronze is non reflective, dark, and in shadows easily appears black.
Besides providing interest to the surface, the green and brownish/red patches suggest shadows formed genuine cavities.
5. Definition space. Moore is defining a real space in which some dimensions are apparent from any one perspective, but not all (as contrasted to a cubist sculptural space where all dimensions are presented). Space is not a theatre for action by masses, but is basically defined by the presence of masses. Our minds are not led by Moore's piece to seek space beyond the boundaries of the masses themselves.
6. Definition of mass (including inertia and gravity). Moore emphasizes resting inertia and the pull of gravity in this sculpture. No possible action is intimated to resist or overcome gravity or inertia. No inner tension inside the piece is suggested. In this sculpture, mass - matter under the influence of gravity and embodying inertia - is primary.
The gravitational effect is demonstrated by several features: the heavier and broader parts of the sculpture being at the bottom and the enlargement of the "limbs". Hence, in the "Bridge" piece:
Illustration 7
Click image to enlarge
This kind of "settling" occurs in all solid masses (e.g., glass window panes) under the influence of gravity over a long time, e.g., centuries.
This feature of the mass is one indication that Moore has imbued the mass with the quality of being aged.
In this composition, mass is not defined by structural composition (as it is in Family Group) but by gravity and inertia. There is resistance to movement.
7. Emotive and qualitative themes. Moore's thematic treatment of the reclining human figure centers around the concept of the organic unity of the human form and nature. This concept appears in several ways. First, from many perspectives, the two pieces appear to be ocean-eroded buttes of land, as appear along any coast. The bridge-piece has had its arches worn away by the tides and surf that would swirl around it. So, too, the head-piece, where the plaster-buildup techniques was used, has an eroded look, like a cliff worked against by wind, tides, and rain wash. These erosions reintroduce the theme of agedness, which appears in the settling of the legs, or arches, due to gravity.
One can suggest an identity between the tides of blood (vascular and menstrual) that wash through the human being - washing out through the arch of the pelvis, in the instance of the female - and the ocean tides that wash the cliffs and buttes of land.
Is there even a pun between the piece with the head and "headland", meaning the continental shelf of land that is out furthest in the ocean?
Moore's attitude toward the concepts he is treating is ambiguous. Does he perceive (conceive) permanence or impermanence of natural form as the basic value?
Does the impermanence of natural form (I hesitate to say "decay", because that word conjures negative cultural undertones) imply anything about art?
8. Exhibition technique. The piece is exhibited on a raised platform about 4 feet high, with free space all around. It is well situated for viewing. Most visitors, however, do not discover, I am sure, that viewing the piece from the front | right perspective (as one enters the Tate) provides the clearest view of the reclining pose; the other perspectives are somewhat puzzling and from them the pose of reclining on the right elbow is not apparent.
9. Later thoughts. Motherland? Motherland/headland with lighthouse/head? Butte of coast line separated from headland. See mother? Lifelong Moore theme of mother/child, mother/separation/child. Psychological tensions caused by separation from motherland.
Recent Comments